It isn’t rocket science to start a risk assessment of your small
business. Begin by examining the physical environment for your workers. Can
objects fall on them from above? Are there equipment or materials that produce
flying particles? Is there intense noise?
Workers' Comp
Prevention Pays
Stressing safety at your small
business can save you a bundle
in workers' comp insurance --
and maybe save a life
By Lawrence Bivins
Learn More:
Are
you liable if a temporary worker is injured?
Where to go for help
|
|
Above: Longistics, a large
distribution center near RDU Airport, provides fall-prevention harnesses
and steel-toed boots to its workers.
Photo by Roger Winstead |
Hardy Dail can leave little to chance. That’s because managing a mammoth
distribution center at the heart of Foreign Trade Zone 93 is something of an
exact science. Clients expect precision inventory management. U.S. Customs
officials, who can inspect the operation at a moment’s notice, have a low
tolerance for rule-benders. In the post-9/11 world, airtight security must be
maintained at all times at the site, which sits at the edge of Raleigh-Durham
International Airport.
Then there’s the vital issue of keeping his 30-person workforce safe — and
complying with regulations enforced by the Occupational Health & Safety
Administration (OSHA). “Safety issues are the first things we discuss at our
monthly meetings,” says Dail, executive vice president of Longistics, the
Raleigh-based company that administers the FTZ.
While Longistics’ warehousing operations don’t face the hazards of many work
environments — there are no noxious chemicals or rotating blades, for example
— employees do operate forklifts, perform tasks at significant heights and run
the risk of dropping weighty objects on their feet. Such is the nature of their
work, and there is little that can be done to alter it.
That’s where the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) becomes crucial.
Longistics purchases fall-prevention harnesses and steel-toed boots for its
warehouse workers, makes sure they know how to use them correctly and watches
closely to make sure they do at all times. “We also have a full-time safety
director who stays current on all OSHA matters,” Dail says.
The important lesson that Dail has learned is that small companies like his must
adhere to the same OSHA regulations as the largest corporations do. Not knowing
the rules isn’t a defense and can have disastrous consequences. Thankfully,
government agencies and private-sector experts are available to assist owners of
small businesses in sifting through the maze of regulations, sizing up the risks
and initiating steps to keep employees safe.
“Before doing anything else, they need to first conduct a risk assessment,”
explains Wayne Lehto, a workplace safety expert with Capital Associated
Industries (CAI) in Raleigh. Legally, an employer cannot introduce PPE without
first having in place a formal safety program, says Lehto, whose organization
works with employers on a range of workplace issues.
Lehto says it isn’t rocket science to start a risk assessment of your small
business. Begin by examining the physical environment for your workers. Can
objects fall on them from above? Are there equipment or materials that produce
flying particles? Is there intense noise? “Common sense definitely comes into
play,” Lehto says.
After thoughtfully examining your place of business, you should review job
procedures required of workers. Ask yourself questions like: Is exposure to
hazardous situations absolutely necessary to their duties?
OSHA requires safety hazards to be eliminated or reduced through engineering or
work practice measures prior to bringing in PPE. Special safety guards might be
installed on equipment, for example, or employees themselves can be removed from
hazardous equipment while it is in use, if possible. Once engineering and work
practice solutions are exhausted, PPE can be deployed to further reduce risk of
injury.
“PPE is the last line of defense against employee injuries,” says Kevin
Beauregard of the N.C. Department of Labor. “With PPE you introduce the human
element.” Such gear must not only be issued to employees, but they must also
know how to deploy it properly and remember to use it. Thus, PPE is, on its own,
rarely a foolproof answer to workplace hazards.
Know Your Specific Hazards
Depending on the protection needed, there are many forms of PPE and hundreds of
products. OSHA publications, for example, list 11 basic types of eye-protection
gear ranging from simple safety goggles to welding helmets. Each is designed to
protect against specific dangers. Some hardhats are built to protect workers
from falling objects; others may be designed to prevent electrical shock in
cases where a worker comes into contact with high-voltage lines.
And there are instances where different workers on the same project will need
different types of PPE depending on their specific duties. Say a crew installing
telecommunications equipment on a utility pole is comprised of a technician
aloft in an aerial lift and another working at ground level. Each would require
a different type of hardhat. Hand protection offers another example. In a food
service environment, one employee is assigned to dice vegetables while another
works the stove. Each set of tasks calls for use of specifically designed gloves
— one that protects against cuts, the other to insulate against burns.
“There might be a thousand different types of gloves, each there to address a
different hazard,” says Beauregard, reiterating the importance of a thorough
assessment.
The unique needs and tastes of individual employees also enter the equation.
Goggles can be made to fit comfortably over prescription eyewear, for example,
or the goggles themselves can be customized with vision correcting lenses. Both
solutions protect against foreign objects entering the eyes and meet OSHA
standards. Determining which to deploy is thus a matter of what the employee
finds more comfortable. “Just as no two operations are ever exactly alike, no
two employees ever have the exact same situation,” Beauregard says.
At Longistics, the selection of steel-toed boots is left to the employee,
assuming the product meets federal standards. “It all boils down to what our
people are comfortable with and what works best for them,” says Hardy Dail.
“As long as they’re approved by OSHA, I don’t care.”
What isn’t up to the employee to decide, at Longistics or any other company,
is whether or not to wear the PPE. OSHA laws specify that PPE be worn at all
times when a hazard is present, and worn properly. In North Carolina, “general
industry” employers are responsible for purchasing and providing PPE to their
workers. All employers also are ultimately held responsible for seeing that the
equipment is used properly. “Simply buying it is not enough,” says Harper
Heckman, an attorney with the Greensboro firm of Adams, Kleemeier, Hagan, Hannah
& Fouts. “You need a system that spells out usage, and you should document
it.”
Be Careful with Training
Some PPE will not be popular with employees, says Heckman, a specialist on the
legal aspects of workplace safety. Some will seek ways to avoid using it.
Effective training can address that challenge. Workers should thoroughly
understand the hazards they face, as well as their potential consequences.
Heckman and others stress that instruction on the proper use of PPE, as well as
its limitations, is central to any safety program.
One mistake employers make is to hand workers the instruction manual that comes
with PPE products and calling that “training.” The practice is insufficient
for a number of reasons. For one, short of administering a test, there is no way
to guarantee an employee has read the instructions. But the real concern lies in
the diverse educational range of some workforces. “There are cases where an
employee can’t read or can’t read the language the manual is printed in,”
says CAI’s Lehto, who recommends face-to-face training or the use of
instructional videotapes.
Language barriers, however, can exist orally or in written form. That’s why
Kevin Beauregard recommends employers offer training in the language workers
best understand. The Department of Labor, he says, now employs bilingual
trainers and is in the process of translating its workplace safety literature
into Spanish. When offering training in a foreign language, employers should
take care that trainers themselves have a firm grasp of the safety issues at
hand, Beauregard says. “Sometime trainers are selected strictly on the basis
of their language skills, not their knowledge of PPE.”
Whatever the delivery mechanism for training, having a paper trail is vital.
“If you’re going to offer a training class, you need documented proof that
employees have completed it,” CAI’s Lehto says. “As far as OSHA is
concerned, you could have a great PPE program, but if it’s not documented, it
doesn’t exist,” according to Lehto.
Not that training, even when done well and documented, is any silver bullet with
OSHA. While the agency makes no requirement that workers be tested on what, if
anything, they gained from training, the law does mandate employers take action
when they see evidence that a worker may need additional instruction. “You
might have employees who don’t learn a thing,” Lehto says. Ongoing efforts
must be made to ensure workers know the rules — and the importance the company
places on following them.
Aim for redundancy, suggests Adams Kleemeier’s Heckman. “Put everything in
the employee handbook, but don’t stop there,” he says. “Review safety
issues at weekly meetings.” Document the discussion, as well as those in
attendance. Invest an employee with the title and responsibility of safety
manager, Heckman advises.
Worth the Expense
Providing PPE devices, which can range from simple plastic earplugs to
sophisticated respirators, can represent a real cost to employers. The
steel-tipped boots purchased by Longistics, for example, cost about $90 per
pair. The company’s fall-prevention harnesses can run as much as $150. Quality
training, sometime in two languages, can also come with a significant price tag.
Nor are there expenses one-time line-items. Many PPE products become worn down
through normal use and must be replaced periodically. New, better-performing
(and typically pricier) gear comes to market regularly, which conscientious
employees often ask for. With it comes the need for more training.
But shunting aside a PPE program, using antiquated products or skimping on
training are, in addition to being contrary to the law, unwise business moves.
“You know the old cliché ‘an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of
cure’?” offers Heckman. “It definitely applies to workplace safety.”
Even before tallying up the potential financial drain associated with excessive
workers’ comp claims, employers must consider the disruption that results from
even minor workplace mishaps. “There’s nothing that will ruin a successful
project quicker than an injury or fatality,” says Heckman, whose clients
include a number of construction firms. “Investing in safety is as important
as investing in a good workforce,” he says.
Companies caught violating OSHA laws face penalties of as much as $70,000,
according to Heckman. But that amount pales in comparison to the workers’
compensation premiums charged to those with poor safety records. Indirect costs
are also worth thinking about: When a worker is injured or, in the worst case,
killed, a replacement must be recruited and trained.
And it doesn’t end there, Heckman warns. “A lot of employers think they’re
immune from civil action because they have worker’s compensation,” he says.
“That’s not necessarily the case.” So-called Woodson Claims, where an
injured worker alleges willful negligence by an employer, are now filed daily,
according to Heckman. PPE costs are a bargain by comparison.
The Department of Labor’s consultative unit is among the range of free
resources employers can tap into for assistance. “It’s one of the most
under-utilized government services,” according to Heckman. He recommends
companies check with their industry trade groups for advice on cost-effective
PPE products and other affordable safety tips.
Drive Home the Message
Employers who sink the necessary investment in PPE and training aren’t off the
hook yet. It remains their responsibility to make sure workers correctly wear
the appropriate safety equipment at the appropriate times. Anything less than a
consistent, visible commitment to the program may lead workers to conclude that
PPE measures are optional. The sight management team not deploying its own
safety gear is one quick way to send the wrong message to workers.
“If the foreman shows up without his PPE, it’s unlikely the workers will
take the policy very seriously,” says the N.C. Department of Labor’s
Beauregard. In fact, once a safety program is designed and training is
completed, supervisory personnel hold the key to ultimate success or failure.
“The front line people — the foreman, crew leaders, line managers — are
critical in this process,” according to Beauregard. In addition to setting a
good example, it is they who must make sure workers deploy safety gear properly.
When supervisors spot workers without required PPE, they must approach them
immediately to discern the reason why, Beauregard suggests. Most programs
utilize a graduated disciplinary system that includes written warnings,
suspensions without pay and, ultimately, termination for a repeated offender.
Firing an employee for failing to follow safety guidelines sends an unmistakable
signal to the rest of the workforce about the company’s seriousness on safety
matters, experts agree. At Longistics, a safe workplace is important enough to
warrant dismissal of a worker upon their first offense. “We have a
zero-tolerance policy,” says Hardy Dail. In his tenure with the company, he
has had to let two employees go under such circumstances, including one valued
worker. “I really hated it, but we’re serious about safety here,” Dail
says. “We issue our people one warning — the day they’re hired.”
Are
You Liable If a Temporary Worker Is Injured?
As the economy strengthens, many firms turn to temporary staff agencies to help
as new business comes in the door. Temp agencies, of which there are some 7,000
nationwide, offer employers staffing flexibility and take some of the recruiting
and screening pressures off in-house human resource departments. But the use of
temporary workers can lead to murky waters when it comes to workplace safety
issues.
“When there’s no long-term commitment, there’s a tendency to shortchange
the worker on training,” explains Jack Forshey, a standards supervisor at the
N.C. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Education, Training and Technical
Assistance. By design, temporary employees work for the agencies that place
them. Temp firms, for example, are responsible for making sure workers are
qualified to perform the work they’re being assigned, and agencies are the
ones required to have workers’ compensation insurance. But that doesn’t free
companies using temp workers of their workplace safety responsibilities, Forshey
warns. “It’s still the employer’s workplace, and the assumption is that
they have control over the worker.”
Should the worst happen, government investigators look at two key areas. They
examine the qualifications and training of the temporary, Forshey says, which is
the purview of the placement agency. Then they consider the level of direct
supervision provided the person, for which the client company is presumed
responsible.
Forshey suggests both parties look closely at the temporary’s qualifications
for the work they’re doing. Some workers, desperate for assignments, will
exaggerate their skills and experience. “They wind up putting themselves at
risk,” he says. Consider a temporary worker operating a forklift. Because
agency staffing clerks likely have minimal direct knowledge of forklift
operation, they may be easily fooled by an unqualified applicant. It is wise for
the client employer, i.e., the warehouse manager, to double-check whether or not
the temp appears competent to operate the equipment. “It’s still your
warehouse and your forklift and, ultimately, your responsibility,” Forshey
says.
David Cline, owner of Cirrus Medical Staffing in Charlotte, says clear
communications between temp agencies and the companies that use them can go far
in reducing the risk of mishaps. The company places nursing and other allied
health professions for three- to six- month assignments. Because medical
professionals and hospitals must abide by an entirely separate set of regulatory
responsibilities, there is less chance of workplace safety issues become a
problem. “This is one of those rare instances when regulations actually
help,” says Cline, a veteran of the temporary staffing world.
To protect themselves from risks, temp agencies should take care that their
clients maintain good workplace safety programs. “When one of our recruiters
makes a placement, we like to have seen the workplace,” says John Lassiter,
president of Carolina Legal Staffing LLC, which has offices in Charlotte and
Raleigh. His company, which places attorneys, legal assistants and
administrative staff, doesn’t face the same concerns that a service
specializing in industrial workers would. Still, it considers matters like
parking lot safety and building security in assessing hazards to the workers it
places. “Our clients tend to be large organizations with fairly aggressive
workplace safety procedures and standards,” Lassiter says.
Temp agencies should see that they are properly insured, advises Lassiter, whose
company hasn’t had a workers’ compensation claim in its nearly seven-year
history. Smaller agencies may attempt to find cost savings in their insurance
program. Others just starting out may simply overlook such details. -- Lawrence
Bivins
Where to Go for Help
Government Publications
“Assessing the Need for Personal Protective Equipment: A Guide for Small
Business Employers” – OSHA, 2000 www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3151.pdf
“A Guide to Personal Protective Equipment” – N.C. Department of Labor,
2001 www.nclabor.com/osha/etta/indguide/ig25.pdf
Web Sites
American National Standards Institute, www.ansi.org
Capital Associated Industries, www.capital.org
Ergonomics Center of North Carolina, www.theergonomicscenter.com
National Safety Council, www.nsc.org
N.C. Department of Labor, www.nclabor.com
Occupational Health and Safety Magazine Online, www.ohsonline.com
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Health and Safety Administration, www.osha.gov
Return to magazine index
|