Air Quality
Position: NCCBI supports reasonable and effective
environmental programs that protect human health and the environmental
resources of North Carolina while meeting business and industry’s
needs for flexibility, responsiveness and sustainability of
development. In general, NCCBI recommends that programs be implemented
at the state level. Generally,
we do not support new state programs that go beyond federal programs
absent a clear showing that further measures are needed to protect
North Carolina’s air resources.
Explanation:
EPA SIP Call And
8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
NCCBI supports the
state’s efforts to develop a technically sound, cost-effective,
state implementation plan (SIP) revision that will reduce ozone levels
in North Carolina to meet the new 8-hour ozone ambient standard. NCCBI
applauds DENR’s efforts to insist that EPA allow sufficient time for
the state to perform a sound technical analysis before committing to a
nitrous oxide (Nox) budget and to emission reductions sufficient to
meet the 8-hour ozone standard. The selection of source controls and
the time table for emission reductions should be justified and
tailored to North Carolina’s needs. All source categories (including
point sources, area sources and mobile sources) should be required to
participate in needed emission reductions, based on their demonstrated
contributions to ozone formation.
Regional Haze And
PM2.5 NAAQS
NCCBI members
recognize the intent of regional haze requirements and believe lead
authority for implementation should be vested in the state air
programs. EPA should be responsible for modeling protocol and model
development/calibration. Working with other states in the sub-region,
DENR should have the flexibility to develop a regional haze program
and improvement targets that are tailored to the needs of NC and
bordering states. States must have the flexibility to develop and
implement regional haze measures in a manner and on a timetable that
is compatible with the PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Federal Land Manager
Involvement In PSD/NSR Review
Air Quality Related
Values (AQRV) should be developed in a public forum with opportunity
for stakeholder involvement. A new source should be able to locate in
a non-attainment area or Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
area in close proximity to a Class I area provided the source is
willing to install the necessary emission control measures and obtain
emission offsets where required.
Acceptable impacts should not be set at levels so low that new
source construction is virtually eliminated. Further, regulatory
requirements should be crafted in a manner that the new source has
access to clearly defined acceptable impact targets upon entering the
permitting process. A
high level of assurance of the time required to go through the
permitting process must be given to applicants to allow for planning
and effective management of resources. Once the AQRVs have been
established for a Class I area, the permitting authority should be
allowed to issue permits on a valid showing by the source that AQRVs
are met.
New Source Review
Reform
NCCBI recognizes the
value of New Source Review (NSR) to the overall protection of North
Carolina’s air resources. NCCBI promotes implementation of the NSR
measures in a manner that ensures the prevention of significant
deterioration of air quality while allowing for economic growth and
prosperity of businesses in North Carolina. For major sources that undergo
physical changes or changes in the method of operation, NCCBI favors
the “potential-to-potential” emissions applicability approach
rather than the “past actual-to-enforceable future actual”
approach. NCCBI believes
that EPA’s current Wisconsin Electric Power Company (WEPCo)
applicability approach should be expanded to all source categories.
NCCBI supports EPA’s proposed exclusions (Pollution Control Project,
“Clean Unit” and “Clean Facility”).
NCCBI believes that
EPA should retain the Clean Air Act’s requirement that a net
emission increase be due to a physical change or change in the method
of operation of a source. An increase in production rate or hours of
operation that results from a preceding physical change or change in
the method of operation that did not by itself result in a net
emission increase should not trigger review.
NCCBI favors the
proposed revisions to streamline the control technology review
requirements by requiring an evaluation of only those control
technologies that have been demonstrated in practice.
Title V Implementation
NCCBI promotes DENR
implementation of the Title V program in a manner that avoids
unnecessary, duplicative and burdensome record keeping and reporting;
that avoids unnecessarily restricting NC business and industry
operational flexibility; and that streamlines to the maximum extent
possible permit renewals, permit revisions, compliance assurance
monitoring and periodic monitoring. DENR should recognize and be
sensitive to federally approved requirements in other states, and not
include provisions that impede North Carolina business and
industry’s ability to compete with other states.
Enforcement
NCCBI supports
measures to address, in a fair and equitable manner, compliance
situations that arise from new emission factors, new emissions’ data
and revised test protocols. Giving sources adequate time to
voluntarily make changes based on the new emission factor or new test
data, rather than instigating enforcement action unilaterally, is
appropriate and will generally yield the needed result.
Other Air Quality
Issues
NCCBI is committed to
working with the state and EPA to ensure that air quality regulatory
issues are resolved in a manner that protects public health and
welfare while meeting business and industry’s needs for flexibility
and responsiveness. Other air quality issues of interest and concern
to NCCBI include the development/implementation of Maximum Achievable
Control Technology (MACT) Standards, 112(r), NC Air Toxics, Global
Warming, Urban Air Toxics and EPCRA/CERCLA Continuous Release
Reporting.
Working
Cooperatively With DENR
NCCBI encourages the
state to work closely with the regulated community when SIP revisions
are being developed to deal with any non-attainment areas that are
identified as a result of current ambient air monitoring of ozone and
PM2.5.
Glossary of Terms:
AQRV – Air Quality
Related Values
CERCLA –
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act
DENR – N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
EPCRA – Emergency
Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
EPA – U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
MACT – Maximum
Achievable Control Technology
NAAQS – National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
NCCBI – North
Carolina Citizens for Business and Industry
NSR – New Source
Review
Nox – Nitrogen Oxide
PM2.5 – Particulate
matter emissions less than 2 microns in diameter
PSD – Prevention of
Significant Deterioration
SIP – North
Carolina’s State Implementation Plan for the federal
Clean Air Act
WEPCo – Wisconsin
Electric Power Company
If you have comments on any of the NCCBI positions
or other issues,
please
click here for a feedback form |
-
Administrative Procedures
Act / Regulatory Reform
Brownfields Redevelopment
-
Communications
-
Endangered Species/Critical Habitats
-
Environmental Protection Policy
-
Environmental Justice
Executive Summary
-
Pollution Prevention, Waste Reduction, And
Energy Management
Risk Management
Sustainable Development
and Growth Planning
-
Science Education
-
Water Quality Protection
-
Wetlands Protection
|